Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/McCaleb v. State

McCaleb v. State

353 S.W.3d 53, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1194, 2011 WL 4036584
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 13, 2011
DocketED 95774
StatusPublished

This text of 353 S.W.3d 53 (McCaleb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCaleb v. State, 353 S.W.3d 53, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1194, 2011 WL 4036584 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Philander Hosea McCaleb, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hagler v. True Manufacturing Co.
353 S.W.3d 53 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
353 S.W.3d 53, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1194, 2011 WL 4036584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccaleb-v-state-moctapp-2011.