McCale v. . New York State Railways
120 N.E. 867, 223 N.Y. 724, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1437
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cuddeback, Caedozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andbews, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCale v. . New York State Railways, 120 N.E. 867, 223 N.Y. 724, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1437 (N.Y. 1918).
120 N.E. 867 (McCale v. . New York State Railways) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.