McCain v. United States of America

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJuly 23, 2012
DocketCivil Action No. 2012-1214
StatusPublished

This text of McCain v. United States of America (McCain v. United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCain v. United States of America, (D.D.C. 2012).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ZACK McCAIN, ) Plaintiff, § v. i civil A@rion NO. 1214 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., § Defendants. l MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendant of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies Brmvn v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Notwithstanding the 336 numbered paragraphs of the plaintiffs complaint, the pleading utterly fails to make a short and plain statement of his claim showing that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief he demands. Rather. the complaint reads as a rambling statement of the plaintiff s observations on the treatment of African American citizens in the Unitcd States and the residual

consequences of his criminal conviction. As drafted, the plaintiff s complaint fails to comply

with Rule S(a). Accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice An Order

consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE;

Unitcd States District Judge '?//e// v

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Califano
75 F.R.D. 497 (District of Columbia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McCain v. United States of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccain-v-united-states-of-america-dcd-2012.