McCain v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McCain v. State

156 S.W. 640, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 748

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 23, 1913·Published

Opinion

H'ARPER, J.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of the offense of keeping a disorderly house, and his punishment assessed at a fine of 8200 and 20 .days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The only ground in the motion for a new trial alleges that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. As no statement of facts accompanies the record, it is impossible for us to review this question.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H'ARPER, J.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of the offense of keeping a disorderly house, and his punishment assessed at a fine of 8200 and 20 .days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The only ground in the motion for a new trial alleges that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. As no statement of facts accompanies the record, it is impossible for us to review this question.

The judgment is affirmed.

McCain v. State, 156 S.W. 640, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 748 (Tex. 1913).

Pincite

156 S.W. 640 (McCain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.