McCain v. McCain

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCain v. McCain

605 So. 2d 92, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6434, 1992 WL 115803

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 1992·No. No. 90-3135·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects with the exception that we agree with appellant that she was entitled to an award of permanent alimony. On that issue we reverse and remand with directions that the award of periodic alimony be made permanent.

In affirming the trial court on all other points, we specifically reject the wife’s claim that the trial court erred in failing to award her a special equity in the wrongful death award recovered by the [93]*93husband arising out of the death of the husband’s child by a previous marriage. Cf. Weisfeld v. Weisfeld, 545 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1989).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects with the exception that we agree with appellant that she was entitled to an award of permanent alimony. On that issue we reverse and remand with directions that the award of periodic alimony be made permanent.

In affirming the trial court on all other points, we specifically reject the wife’s claim that the trial court erred in failing to award her a special equity in the wrongful death award recovered by the [93]*93husband arising out of the death of the husband’s child by a previous marriage. Cf. Weisfeld v. Weisfeld, 545 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1989).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

McCain v. McCain, 605 So. 2d 92, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6434, 1992 WL 115803 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

605 So. 2d 92 (McCain v. McCain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related