McCain, Steven Dale
This text of McCain, Steven Dale (McCain, Steven Dale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,422-01
EX PARTE STEVEN DALE MCCAIN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. C-372-W012057-1373308-A IN THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT COURT FROM TARRANT COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child under 14 and sentenced to 30
years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. McCain v. State, No.
02-16-00411-CR (Tex. App. – Fort Worth, March 15, 2018). Applicant filed this application for a
writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court.
See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
On Nov. 11, 2021, Applicant filed a motion to recuse the habeas judge. The judge did not
agree to recuse himself and referred the motion to the presiding judge of the administrative region.
The Presiding Judge for the Eighth Administrative Judicial Region scheduled a hearing on the recusal motion for Jan. 6, 2022. On Jan. 11, 2022, he signed an order resetting the hearing for Jan.
20, 2022.
The application was forwarded to this Court on Jan. 3, 2022. The district clerk properly
forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(5).
However, because recusal proceedings were pending when the habeas corpus record was forwarded
to this Court, no judge has participated in the review of this writ application. TEX . R. CIV . P. 18a.
We remand this application to the trial court. Following the recusal proceedings, the
appropriate judge shall review the pleadings and determine whether there are controverted,
previously unresolved facts material to the legality of the Applicant's confinement. TEX. CODE
CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07 § 3(c). If the court determines that there are such facts, the court shall
designate the appropriate issues and resolve them. If not, the court shall enter an order finding that
there are no unresolved issues material to the legality of Applicant's confinement and notify the
District Clerk so the writ record may be returned to this Court.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has reviewed the writ
application and resolved any fact issues, if necessary. Any issues shall be resolved within 90 days
of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the
transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with any findings of
fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this
order. TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and
shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: March 9, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McCain, Steven Dale, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccain-steven-dale-texcrimapp-2022.