McCaghren v. Town of Moulton

268 So. 2d 886, 49 Ala. App. 107, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 799
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedOctober 24, 1972
Docket8 Div. 217
StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 2d 886 (McCaghren v. Town of Moulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCaghren v. Town of Moulton, 268 So. 2d 886, 49 Ala. App. 107, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 799 (Ala. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

Appellee has filed a motion to strike appellant’s brief for the reason that said brief was filed more than thirty days after the transcript of the record was filed with the Clerk of this Court. Appellee further moves this Court to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lawrence County. The motion must be granted.

The transcript was filed in this Court on January 24, 1972. Accordingly, under the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 12, appellant’s brief was due to be filed in this Court “within thirty days after” January 24, (this date not being included in counting the period of thirty days, Supreme Court Rule 46), that is, on or before February 23, 1972, absent an extension of time for filing as provided by Rule 12. Appellant’s brief was filed in this Court on March 10, 1972, being sixteen days late. The record is silent as to an extension of time for filing briefs.

It is settled law that the time prescribed by Supreme Court Rule 12 for filing appellant’s brief is mandatory. NO' matter how meritorious an appeal may be, we must yield to this mandatory requirement of the rule and order a dismissal of [108]*108the cause. Board of Commissioners of the City of Montgomery v. Crenshaw, 270 Ala. 598, 120 So.2d 870; Page v. State of Alabama, 273 Ala. 227, 137 So.2d 740; Moore v. Moore, 279 Ala. 122, 182 So.2d 855; Tipton v. Tipton, 267 Ala. 64, 100 So.2d 14.

Motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Appeal dismissed.

CATES, P. J, and ALMON, TYSON, and DeCARLO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tipton v. Tipton
100 So. 2d 14 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Board of Commissioners of the City of Montgomery v. Crenshaw
120 So. 2d 870 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Page v. State ex rel. Wright
137 So. 2d 740 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
Moore v. Moore
182 So. 2d 855 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 So. 2d 886, 49 Ala. App. 107, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccaghren-v-town-of-moulton-alacrimapp-1972.