McCaffrey v. Rosenthal
This text of 254 A.D. 757 (McCaffrey v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for damages for fraud and deceit in connection with the alleged inducing of plaintiff’s assignor to purchase certain securities. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for examination before trial affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. (Nixon v. Beacon Transp. Corp., 239 App. Div. 830; Freisinger v. Reibach, 254 id. 575; Knox v. Stralem, 247 id. 736.) The examination will proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 757, 4 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccaffrey-v-rosenthal-nyappdiv-1938.