McCaffrey-Ruddock Tagline Corp. v. Hoskins

305 So. 2d 877
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 1974·No. No. V-117·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this petition for writ of certiorari, the petitioners in seeking the extraordinary writ of common law certiorari argues that the trial court erred in not granting its motion to dismiss. Without reaching the merits, it is our view that the office of common law certiorari is not available to petitioners; therefore, the subject petition is

Denied.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCaffrey-Ruddock Tagline Corp. v. Hoskins, 305 So. 2d 877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

305 So. 2d 877 (McCaffrey-Ruddock Tagline Corp. v. Hoskins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boston Old Colony Insurance Company v. Popple
305 So. 2d 877 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)