McCaffrey-Ruddock Tagline Corp. v. Hoskins
305 So. 2d 877
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 5, 1974
DocketNo. V-117
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 305 So. 2d 877 (McCaffrey-Ruddock Tagline Corp. v. Hoskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCaffrey-Ruddock Tagline Corp. v. Hoskins, 305 So. 2d 877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).
Opinion
In this petition for writ of certiorari, the petitioners in seeking the extraordinary writ of common law certiorari argues that the trial court erred in not granting its motion to dismiss. Without reaching the merits, it is our view that the office of common law certiorari is not available to petitioners; therefore, the subject petition is
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Boston Old Colony Insurance Company v. Popple
305 So. 2d 877 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
305 So. 2d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccaffrey-ruddock-tagline-corp-v-hoskins-fladistctapp-1974.