McCafferty v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McCafferty v. State

1923 OK CR 368, 223 P. 208, 26 Okla. Crim. 226, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 365

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 29, 1923

DocketNo. A-4401.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 368 (McCafferty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCafferty v. State, 1923 OK CR 368, 223 P. 208, 26 Okla. Crim. 226, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 365 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

MATSON, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for maintaining a liquor nuisance on premises located in Oklahoma county, Okla., more particularly described as the southeast quarter of section 18, township 13, range 1 west. Judgment was rendered on March 13, 1922, and punishment fixed at a fine of $500 and six months’ imprisonment in the county jail. Petition in. error and case-made were filed in this court on July 8, 1922. The cause was finally submitted on the record on November 8, 1923.

No appearance was made by counsel representing plaintiff in error to orally argue the cause at the time same was submitted, nor has any brief been filed in his behalf. An examination of the record discloses no prejudicial error, and the cause is therefore affirmed under rule 9 of this court.

*227 Judgment affirmed, and cause remanded to the county court of Oklahoma county, with directions to carry the judgment into effect.

BESSEY and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATSON, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for maintaining a liquor nuisance on premises located in Oklahoma county, Okla., more particularly described as the southeast quarter of section 18, township 13, range 1 west. Judgment was rendered on March 13, 1922, and punishment fixed at a fine of $500 and six months’ imprisonment in the county jail. Petition in. error and case-made were filed in this court on July 8, 1922. The cause was finally submitted on the record on November 8, 1923.

No appearance was made by counsel representing plaintiff in error to orally argue the cause at the time same was submitted, nor has any brief been filed in his behalf. An examination of the record discloses no prejudicial error, and the cause is therefore affirmed under rule 9 of this court.

*227 Judgment affirmed, and cause remanded to the county court of Oklahoma county, with directions to carry the judgment into effect.

BESSEY and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 368, 223 P. 208, 26 Okla. Crim. 226, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccafferty-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.