McCadden v. West End Building & Loan Ass'n
21 A.2d 737, 127 N.J.L. 245, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 254
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Perskie.
It is not contended that there is no sufficient basis in the evidence for the finding that the enucleation of the employee’s eye was due to the industrial accident; and we have not considered that question.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Fetter, Poetes, Colte, Deae, Wells, WolfsKetl, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCadden v. West End Building & Loan Ass'n, 21 A.2d 737, 127 N.J.L. 245, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 254 (N.J. 1941).
21 A.2d 737 (McCadden v. West End Building & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heidel v. Wallace & Tiernan
117 A.2d 678 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Shuler v. EASTERN FOUNDRY, INC.
111 A.2d 802 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation v. Stephen O'hearne
218 F.2d 651 (Fourth Circuit, 1955)
Old Dominion Stevedoring Corp. v. O'Hearne
218 F.2d 651 (Fourth Circuit, 1955)
McKenzie v. Gulf Hills Hotel, Inc.
74 So. 2d 830 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Iacone v. Cardillo
208 F.2d 696 (Second Circuit, 1953)