McCadden v. . Pender

20 S.E. 208, 115 N.C. 64
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 20 S.E. 208 (McCadden v. . Pender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCadden v. . Pender, 20 S.E. 208, 115 N.C. 64 (N.C. 1894).

Opinion

Pee, Cueiam :

We are of the opinion that there is no mis-joinder, and that a cause of action is stated in the complaint.

We think it best to defer the discussion of the questions argued by counsel until the case shall be tried and the facts more fully developed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.E. 208, 115 N.C. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccadden-v-pender-nc-1894.