McCabe v. Town of Riverhead

2 A.D.3d 416, 767 N.Y.S.2d 802
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 1, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 2 A.D.3d 416 (McCabe v. Town of Riverhead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCabe v. Town of Riverhead, 2 A.D.3d 416, 767 N.Y.S.2d 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

[417]*417In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated October 2, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Town of Riverhead did not receive prior written notice of the sidewalk defect over which the plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell as required by the Town of Riverhead Code § 10-2. Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the two letters regarding the general deteriorated condition of the sidewalks in the downtown district did not sufficiently identify the particular defect which caused the plaintiff to fall and its location (see Hampton v Town of N. Hempstead, 298 AD2d 556 [2002]; Camenson v Town of N. Hempstead, 298 AD2d 543 [2002]; Gellos v Town of Hempstead, 284 AD2d 370 [2001]; James v City of New Rochelle, 282 AD2d 503, 505 [2001]). Furthermore, notice of one isolated sidewalk defect in front of property adjoining the subject property more than two years before this accident did not, without more, qualify as notice of the particular sidewalk defect in front of the subject property (see Jones v Town of Brookhaven, 227 AD2d 530 [1996]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nieves v. City of New York
189 N.Y.S.3d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Cornish v. City of Ithaca
149 A.D.3d 1321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Doxey v. Freeport Union Free School District
115 A.D.3d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Martens v. County of Suffolk
100 A.D.3d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Pagano v. Town of Smithtown
74 A.D.3d 1304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Dalton v. City of Saratoga Springs
12 A.D.3d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.3d 416, 767 N.Y.S.2d 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccabe-v-town-of-riverhead-nyappdiv-2003.