McCabe v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McCabe v. State

392 S.W.3d 575, 2013 WL 968113, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 316

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 12, 2013·No. No. WD 74903·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ricky McCabe appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. McCabe sought to vacate his conviction for possession of a prohibited article in a county jail, section 221.111, and sentence as a persistent offender to twenty-five years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that trial counsel was ineffective in objecting to the State’s request to strike a juror for cause. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ricky McCabe appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. McCabe sought to vacate his conviction for possession of a prohibited article in a county jail, section 221.111, and sentence as a persistent offender to twenty-five years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that trial counsel was ineffective in objecting to the State’s request to strike a juror for cause. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

McCabe v. State, 392 S.W.3d 575, 2013 WL 968113, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 316 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

392 S.W.3d 575 (McCabe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.