McCabe v. County of Dutchess

143 A.D.2d 670, 533 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9321
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 3, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 A.D.2d 670 (McCabe v. County of Dutchess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCabe v. County of Dutchess, 143 A.D.2d 670, 533 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondents dated November 6, 1986, terminating the petitioner’s probationary employment as an engineering aide, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered March 19, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding on the merits.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On appeal, the petitioner claims that it was improper for the Supreme Court to dismiss, without a hearing, his petition which challenged his discharge as a probationary employee on the ground that the termination was made in bad faith. We disagree.

In support of their motion to dismiss the proceeding, the respondents submitted an affidavit of the respondent James Spratt, the Commissioner of the Department of Public Works, which indicated that the decision to terminate the petitioner’s [671]*671employment was made after discussion with three of the petitioner’s supervisors, who were apparently familiar with the petitioner’s work performance. The fact that the petitioner’s immediate supervisor favored the petitioner’s retention "is not sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the commissioner’s bad faith” (Matter of York v McGuire, 99 AD2d 1023, 1024, affd 63 NY2d 760; see, Matter of Johnson v Katz, 68 NY2d 649). The cases of Matter of Wilborn v Starr (58 AD2d 785) and Matter of Yates v Grecco (85 AD2d 817), relied upon by the petitioner, are inapposite.

Accordingly, since no hearing on the issue of bad faith was warranted, dismissal of the proceeding was proper (see, Matter of Johnson v Katz, supra). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abbondandolo v. Edwards
174 A.D.2d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 A.D.2d 670, 533 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccabe-v-county-of-dutchess-nyappdiv-1988.