McCabe v. Boston Terminal Co.

309 U.S. 624, 60 S. Ct. 725
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 12, 1940·No. No. 437·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The Supreme Judicial Court, holding that the plaintiff’s cause of action arose under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, directed judgment for the defendant upon the ground [625]*625that the time had passed within which an action could be brought or an amendment allowed setting up such a cause of action. We are of the opinion that this was error and that an opportunity for such an amendment should have been afforded. New York Central & Hudson River R. Co. v. Kinney, 260 U. S. 340. The judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Mr. Laurence D. Yont, with whom Messrs'. Alonzo E. Yont and Henry Lawlor were on the brief, for petitioner. Messrs. Joseph Wentworth and John M. Hall, with whom .Mr. John L. Hall was on the brief, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCabe v. Boston Terminal Co., 309 U.S. 624, 60 S. Ct. 725 (1940).

309 U.S. 624 (McCabe v. Boston Terminal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mazloum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
281 A.D. 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Williams v. TRUSTEES OF NY, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RD
90 N.E.2d 320 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Williams v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
90 N.E.2d 320 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Claim of Story v. Pennsylvania Railroad
259 A.D. 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)