McCabe-Duprey Tanning Co. v. Eubanks
This text of 102 P. 795 (McCabe-Duprey Tanning Co. v. Eubanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Decided July 13, 1909.
On Motion to Dismiss.
[102 Pao. 795.]
Opinion by
“The time within which an act is to be done, as provided in this code, shall be computed by excluding the first day and including the last, unless the last day fall upon a Sunday, Christmas, or other non judicial day, in which case the last day shall also be excluded.”
Section 531, B. & C. Comp. According to the above rule, by excluding the first day — i. e., the 29th of January [47]*47—the defendant had two days remaining in that month and 28 days in February, in order to complete the required 30 days; but as the last day, or the 28th of February, was Sunday, that day was properly excluded, and the defendant was allowed until the following day, or the 1st of March, 1909, within which to file the transcript (Boothe v. Scriber, 48 Or. 561: 87 Pac. 887: 90 Pac. 1002) ; and, as he filed it with the clerk of this court on that day, he complied with the rule announced.
The motion will therefore be denied. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 P. 795, 57 Or. 44, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccabe-duprey-tanning-co-v-eubanks-or-1910.