McBurnett v. State

59 S.E.2d 374, 206 Ga. 841, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 593
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 8, 1950
DocketNo. 17054
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 S.E.2d 374 (McBurnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McBurnett v. State, 59 S.E.2d 374, 206 Ga. 841, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 593 (Ga. 1950).

Opinion

Aumand, Justice.

The ruling of this court in Parks, alias Alexander, v. State, 206 Ga. 675 (58 S. E. 2d, 142), controls in every essential detail the questions raised in the case at bar, and requires that the judgment of the trial court be, and it is hereby,

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Hicks & Culbert, for plaintiff in error. W. T. Maddox, Solicitor-General, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McBurnett v. Balkcom
62 S.E.2d 180 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 S.E.2d 374, 206 Ga. 841, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcburnett-v-state-ga-1950.