McBryant v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 534, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 390
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 21, 1918
Docket8496
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 813 (McBryant v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McBryant v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 534, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 390 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The only question raised in this case is whether or not the court erred in granting a nonsuit. Inasmuch as we have after a careful examination of the evidence decided that the judgment of nonsuit was improper, it might work injury to the parties [535]*535to discuss the evidence. Suffice it to say that the evidence tends to establish the case as pleaded by the plaintiff, and the questions as to alleged negligence were, under the evidence in the case, purely jury questions. The court erred in granting the nonsuit.

Judgment reversed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenlcins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keebler v. Willard
72 S.E.2d 805 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 534, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbryant-v-southern-cotton-oil-co-gactapp-1918.