McBryant v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.
94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 534, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 390
Opinion
The only question raised in this case is whether or not the court erred in granting a nonsuit. Inasmuch as we have after a careful examination of the evidence decided that the judgment of nonsuit was improper, it might work injury to the parties [535] to discuss the evidence. Suffice it to say that the evidence tends to establish the case as pleaded by the plaintiff, and the questions as to alleged negligence were, under the evidence in the case, purely jury questions. The court erred in granting the nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McBryant v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 534, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 390 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
94 S.E. 813 (McBryant v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keebler v. Willard
72 S.E.2d 805 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)