McBroom v. MT Board of Personnel

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McBroom v. MT Board of Personnel. Read the opinion of the Court — 2025 MT 64
Montana Supreme Court·Decided October 30, 2024·No. DA 24-0455·Unpublished

Opinion

10/30/2024

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 24-0455 Case No. DA 24-0455

MITCHELL MCBROOM and BARBARA LEWIS-BACA, Petitioners – Appellants, v. MONTANA BOARD OF PERSONNEL APPEALS and MISSOULA URBAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, Respondents – Appellees.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF

On Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County Hon. District Court Judge Jason Marks

The Court, having reviewed Respondent/Appellee Missoula Urban

Transportation District’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Brief

pursuant to Mont. R. App. P. 26(1) and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent/Appellee Missoula Urban

Transportation District’s Motion is GRANTED and these Respondent shall have

until December 6, 2024, to file their Response Brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court October 30 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBroom v. MT Board of Personnel, (Mo. 2024).

McBroom v. MT Board of Personnel (McBroom v. MT Board of Personnel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.