McBroom v. Corporation of Lebanon
This text of 31 Ind. 268 (McBroom v. Corporation of Lebanon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The code provides that every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. 2 G-. & H. 84, sec, 8. The note sued on, being made payable to the treasurer of what purports to be a corporation, without giving the name of the treasurer, is, in effect, payable to the corporation, and shows it to be the party in interest. It is well settled in this State, that where one contracts [270]*270with what purports to be a corporation, he is estopped from denying the existence of the corporation at the date of the contract. We do not judicially know that there is not, or cannot bo, a corporation by the name of the “ Corporation of Lebanon,” under the laws of this State. We have various statutes under which a corporation might be legally organized in such a name.
We see no error in the rulings of the court complained of, and the judgment must therefore be affirmed.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 Ind. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbroom-v-corporation-of-lebanon-ind-1869.