McBro, A Division of McCarthy Bros. Co. v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.

576 So. 2d 1360, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2742, 1991 WL 45219
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 1991·No. No. 90-1630·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. Noriega, 542 So.2d 1327 (Fla.1989); Cuevas v. Potamkin Dodge, Inc., 483 So.2d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Loxahatchee River Environmental Control Dist. v. Guy Villa & Sons, Inc., 371 So.2d 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 346 (Fla.1979); § 682.13(l)(c), Fla.Stat. (1987); compare Cuevas v. Potamkin Dodge, Inc., 455 So.2d 398 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (party who voluntarily enters into arbitration agreement which does not provide for fees is not entitled to recover such fees).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBro, A Division of McCarthy Bros. Co. v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc., 576 So. 2d 1360, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2742, 1991 WL 45219 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

576 So. 2d 1360 (McBro, A Division of McCarthy Bros. Co. v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. McBro
619 So. 2d 324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)