McBride v. Willamette Columbia River Towing Company

251 P. 1119, 141 Wash. 700, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 1107
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1926
DocketNo. 20053. Department Two.
StatusPublished

This text of 251 P. 1119 (McBride v. Willamette Columbia River Towing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McBride v. Willamette Columbia River Towing Company, 251 P. 1119, 141 Wash. 700, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 1107 (Wash. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is the second trip of this litigation to this court, and on the first one it was held, in 132 Wash.’ 360,-232 Pac. 286, that the evidence was sufficient to establish the appellant’s liability for negligent navigation, but a judgment in favor of the respondents was set aside for the reason that an improper instruction-had been given.

This appeal presents nothing that was' not fully disposed of in-the prior decision, the only errors assigned being the refusal of the court to grant a motion for nonsuit or for a directed verdict. • The-evidence on the second trial having been to the same effect as that' considered on the first appeal, and the law of the case having been established by that decision, there remains nothing to be done but to affirm the present judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McBride v. Willamette Columbia R.T. Co.
232 P. 286 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 P. 1119, 141 Wash. 700, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 1107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-willamette-columbia-river-towing-company-wash-1926.