McBride v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

McBride v. Virginia

325 F. App'x 172

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 6, 2009

DocketNo. 08-2231

StatusPublished

This text of 325 F. App'x 172 (McBride v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McBride v. Virginia, 325 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert McBride appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this action challenging the constitutionality of a Virginia statute and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McBride v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 2:08-cv-00367-RBS-JEB (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 9, 2008, entered Sept. 11, 2008; filed Sept. 23, 2008, entered Sept. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral [173]*173argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert McBride appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this action challenging the constitutionality of a Virginia statute and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McBride v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 2:08-cv-00367-RBS-JEB (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 9, 2008, entered Sept. 11, 2008; filed Sept. 23, 2008, entered Sept. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral [173]*173argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 F. App'x 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-virginia-ca4-2009.