McBride v. State
133 S.E. 877, 35 Ga. App. 496, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 940
This text of 133 S.E. 877 (McBride v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McBride v. State, 133 S.E. 877, 35 Ga. App. 496, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 940 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
1. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, not having been argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.
2. The verdict was authorized by’ the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 877, 35 Ga. App. 496, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-state-gactapp-1926.