McBride v. State
This text of 982 So. 2d 1249 (McBride v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jason McBRIDE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Marvin F. Clegg, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
After pleading guilty pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, Appellant seeks review on two points: his sentence as a prison releasee reoffender and the denial of his motion to disqualify the trial judge before he entered his plea. We affirm the sentence because the record bears out that Appellant met the statutory criteria for the sentence and agreed to it. We cannot review the second issue, however, because Appellant pled guilty after his motion to disqualify was denied. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2).
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
982 So. 2d 1249, 2008 WL 2219294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.