McBride v. State
This text of 695 So. 2d 405 (McBride v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, a juvenile, was convicted of grand theft pursuant to a plea agreement. We affirm his conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for the entry of a written order imposing adult sanctions. § 39.059(7), Fla. Stat. (1995). See Roberts v. State, 677 So.2d 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Wood v. State, 655 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). A resentencing hearing is not required. Bridgewater v. State, 668 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); see also Nation v. State, 668 So.2d 284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
695 So. 2d 405, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4975, 1997 WL 231539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.