McBride v. State
655 So. 2d 239, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6122, 1995 WL 334379
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of community control but remand to the trial court to correct the order. Because the trial judge’s oral pronouncement was that he found counts 1 and 4 to be marginal violations at best and that he did not base revocation on those grounds, we agree that the final order incorrectly states that the revocation was based on all four grounds and must be corrected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McBride v. State, 655 So. 2d 239, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6122, 1995 WL 334379 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
655 So. 2d 239 (McBride v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Colantuono v. State
853 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)