McBride v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McBride v. State

655 So. 2d 239, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6122, 1995 WL 334379

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 7, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1724

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 655 So. 2d 239 (McBride v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McBride v. State, 655 So. 2d 239, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6122, 1995 WL 334379 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

We affirm the revocation of community control but remand to the trial court to correct the order. Because the trial judge’s oral pronouncement was that he found counts 1 and 4 to be marginal violations at best and that he did not base revocation on those grounds, we agree that the final order incorrectly states that the revocation was based on all four grounds and must be corrected.

GLICKSTEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARMER, Judge.

We affirm the revocation of community control but remand to the trial court to correct the order. Because the trial judge’s oral pronouncement was that he found counts 1 and 4 to be marginal violations at best and that he did not base revocation on those grounds, we agree that the final order incorrectly states that the revocation was based on all four grounds and must be corrected.

GLICKSTEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

655 So. 2d 239, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6122, 1995 WL 334379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack