McBride v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McBride v. State

95 So. 920, 19 Ala. App. 196, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 79

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 10, 1923

Docket8 Div. 967.

StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 920 (McBride v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McBride v. State, 95 So. 920, 19 Ala. App. 196, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 79 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of manufacturing whisky, and, from the judgment overruling his motion for new trial, he appeals.- .

The bill of exceptions fails to state that it contains all of the evidence, and, in.the absence of this statement, we must presume there was other and sufficient evidence to support the verdict. There is no error in the record, and the judgment' is dffirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMPORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of manufacturing whisky, and, from the judgment overruling his motion for new trial, he appeals.- .

The bill of exceptions fails to state that it contains all of the evidence, and, in.the absence of this statement, we must presume there was other and sufficient evidence to support the verdict. There is no error in the record, and the judgment' is dffirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 So. 920, 19 Ala. App. 196, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-state-alactapp-1923.