McBride v. Lee

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McBride v. Lee

721 So. 2d 444, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15253, 1998 WL 833530

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 4, 1998

DocketNo. 97-2522

StatusPublished

This text of 721 So. 2d 444 (McBride v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McBride v. Lee, 721 So. 2d 444, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15253, 1998 WL 833530 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PETERSON, J.

In this dissolution proceeding, A. Leigh McBride, D.V.M., appeals the trial court’s determination concerning the value of her veterinary practice.

We agree with Dr. McBride’s contention that the record does not contain competent substantial evidence of any increase in the value of her professional association during the marriage. Accordingly1, we vacate that portion of the final judgment finding the enhanced value of the association to be $50,-000, and order the trial court, upon remand, to reduce the equalizing equitable distribution payment due to Mr. Lee from $35,478.47 to $10,478.47.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETERSON, J.

In this dissolution proceeding, A. Leigh McBride, D.V.M., appeals the trial court’s determination concerning the value of her veterinary practice.

We agree with Dr. McBride’s contention that the record does not contain competent substantial evidence of any increase in the value of her professional association during the marriage. Accordingly1, we vacate that portion of the final judgment finding the enhanced value of the association to be $50,-000, and order the trial court, upon remand, to reduce the equalizing equitable distribution payment due to Mr. Lee from $35,478.47 to $10,478.47.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

721 So. 2d 444, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15253, 1998 WL 833530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-lee-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack