McBride v. Langan

11 N.Y.S. 626
New York Circuit Court·Decided May 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ingraham, J.

By the service of the amended complaint in this action, and the answer to that amended complaint, a new issue was raised which must be noticed for trial. Undoubtedly the court had the power as a condition for granting the amendment to require that the former notice of trial should stand, but no such order was made. I think, therefore, the plaintiff must notice the case regularly for trial before it can be set down for trial.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBride v. Langan, 11 N.Y.S. 626 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

11 N.Y.S. 626 (McBride v. Langan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Myers v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
12 N.Y.S. 2 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1890)