McBride v. Jones

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 2002
Docket02-7075
StatusUnpublished

This text of McBride v. Jones (McBride v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McBride v. Jones, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7075

CHANTOMMIE MCBRIDE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEVE JONES, Sergeant, Anderson County Sheriff’s Office; BANNISTER, Anderson County Sheriff’s Office; C. J. FULLER, Iver Police Department; COLENNA LYNN HAMBY; HARVEY SAMUEL GARLAND; RALF ALLEN GESELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-816-9-23)

Submitted: October 23, 2002 Decided: November 20, 2002

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chantommie McBride, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Chantommie McBride appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McBride v. Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-jones-ca4-2002.