McBride v. Jones
This text of McBride v. Jones (McBride v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7075
CHANTOMMIE MCBRIDE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STEVE JONES, Sergeant, Anderson County Sheriff’s Office; BANNISTER, Anderson County Sheriff’s Office; C. J. FULLER, Iver Police Department; COLENNA LYNN HAMBY; HARVEY SAMUEL GARLAND; RALF ALLEN GESELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-816-9-23)
Submitted: October 23, 2002 Decided: November 20, 2002
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chantommie McBride, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Chantommie McBride appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McBride v. Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-jones-ca4-2002.