McBride v. Harris
35 N.Y.S. 689, 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 259, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 486
Opinion
Many of the papers on which the original order was made, and on which the motion for reargument was founded, which are recited in the order appealed from, not appearing in the record, we must assume that they sustain the order of the special term, which is therefore affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McBride v. Harris, 35 N.Y.S. 689, 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 259, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 486 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
35 N.Y.S. 689 (McBride v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tenoza v. Golliek
81 N.Y.S. 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)