McBride v. Commonwealth

432 S.W.2d 410, 1968 Ky. LEXIS 331
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 4, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 432 S.W.2d 410 (McBride v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McBride v. Commonwealth, 432 S.W.2d 410, 1968 Ky. LEXIS 331 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

MONTGOMERY, Chief Justice.

On December 7, 1967, Danny Wayne McBride was sentenced under a two-count indictment to two years’ imprisonment for dwelling house breaking and one year for obtaining money under false pretenses, the sentences to run consecutively to each other, and to a two-year sentence for another conviction of dwelling house breaking entered the same date, making a total of five years to be served. With assistance of counsel, all three sentences were upon pleas of guilty.

On June 3, 1968, he filed a “motion for a concurrent sentence,” asking the trial court to direct that these three sentences be made to run concurrently with each other on the grounds that his lack of a previous record and his enrollment in the penitentiary school system were factors which would make the serving of the sentence of the entire five years “do more harm than good.” He appeals from the order overruling that motion.

Inasmuch as the time had expired for the filing of a direct appeal at the time of the filing of his motion, it will be construed as a collateral attack on the sentences under RCr 11.42. However, there is no merit in such collateral attack. RCr [411]*41111.04 authorizes the trial court to impose consecutive sentences. The question of whether sentences shall run consecutively or concurrently is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. Delk v. Commonwealth, Ky., 285 S.W.2d 169, 57 A.L.R.2d 1406; Schumaker v. Wright, Ky., 390 S.W. 2d 887. There is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, there is no merit in the appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael Reynolds v. Steve Berry, Warden
146 F.3d 345 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
American Pioneer Life Insurance v. Smith
504 S.W.2d 356 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1974)
Delacey v. Commonwealth
494 S.W.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1973)
Dixon v. Commonwealth
478 S.W.2d 719 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1972)
Evans v. Commonwealth
453 S.W.2d 601 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
432 S.W.2d 410, 1968 Ky. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1968.