MCBRIDE v. CMI WAL-MART STORE 3397
This text of MCBRIDE v. CMI WAL-MART STORE 3397 (MCBRIDE v. CMI WAL-MART STORE 3397) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Diane McBride, Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 18-25072-Civ-Scola Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., ) Defendant. ) Order Adopting Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for a report and recommendation on the Defendant’s motion for sanctions against the Plaintiff. (Def.’s Mot., ECF No. 72.) On May 15, 2020, Judge Torres issued a report, recommending that the Court grant the motion in part and deny the motion in part. (R. & R., ECF No. 96.) No objections have been filed and the time to object has passed. As a result, the Court reviews Judge Torres’s report for clear error. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Having considered Judge Torres’s report, the record, and the relevant legal authorities, the Court finds the report and recommendation cogent and compelling. Accordingly, the Court affirms and adopts Judge Torres’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 96), and the motion is granted in part and denied in part (ECF No. 72). The Court hereby precludes any testimony from the Plaintiff at trial. Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, ONES L— Robert N. Scola, Jr. United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MCBRIDE v. CMI WAL-MART STORE 3397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-cmi-wal-mart-store-3397-flsd-2020.