McBride v. Clark
127 A. 550, 101 N.J.L. 223, 2 N.J. Misc. 814, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 213
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, MoGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McBride v. Clark, 127 A. 550, 101 N.J.L. 223, 2 N.J. Misc. 814, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 1925).
127 A. 550 (McBride v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Paulk
705 F.2d 1279 (Tenth Circuit, 1983)
Saks Theatrical Agency v. Mentine
48 A.2d 644 (U.S. District Court, 1946)