McBreen Realty Co. v. Vogel

136 Misc. 458, 241 N.Y.S. 196, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1178
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided April 10, 1930·Published

Opinion

Noonan, J.

The judgment debtor, Irving Vogel, was served with the order in supplementary proceedings on February 19, 1930. This order contained an injunction forbidding him from transferring or disposing of any of his property. It is claimed that the judgment debtor violated this order by the payment of the sum of $250 to his sister on February 24, 1930, and by the payment of a similar sum to her on March 1, 1930. These moneys were delivered to his sister, as claimed by him, under an assignment executed long previous to the service of the order in supplementary proceedings, in payment of an indebtedness owing to her. It appears that these sums of money represented salary earned by the judgment debtor and paid to him by his employer subsequent to the making of the order. The judgment debtor cannot be held in contempt, since these moneys were after-acquired property and not subject to the injunction. (Potter v. Low, 16 How. Pr. 549; Rainsford v. Temple, 3 Misc. 294; Kroner v. Reilly, 49 App. Div. 41.) Motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBreen Realty Co. v. Vogel, 136 Misc. 458, 241 N.Y.S. 196, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1178 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1930).

136 Misc. 458 (McBreen Realty Co. v. Vogel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kroner v. Reilly
49 A.D. 41 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Potter v. Low
16 How. Pr. 549 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Rainsford v. Temple
22 N.Y.S. 937 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)