McBratney v. United States

99 F. 424, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5025
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 18, 1900
DocketNo. 2,954
StatusPublished

This text of 99 F. 424 (McBratney v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McBratney v. United States, 99 F. 424, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5025 (circtsdny 1900).

Opinion

/WHEELED, .District Judge.

The. articles now in question are linen doilies and tray cloths, weighing under 4/- ounces to the square yard, and containing more than 100 threads to the square inch, and have been classified as “manufactures of flax” not specially provided for, under paragraph 847 of the act of 1897, against a protest that they are “woven fabrics of flax,” under the last clause of paragraph 346. They are woven, and the question is whether they are “fabrics,” in tariff speech. In the piece they are fabrics. They are none the less so by being cut apart. The word is amply broad enough to include them. Junge v. Hedden, 146 U. S. 233, 13 Sup. Ct. 88, 36 L. Ed. 953, and the cases there referred to, seem to support, rather than to be contrary to, this view. Decision reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Junge v. Hedden
146 U.S. 233 (Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 F. 424, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbratney-v-united-states-circtsdny-1900.