MCB Oil Co. v. City of Gainesville

932 So. 2d 504, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9788, 2006 WL 1650654
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 2006·No. No. 1D06-0963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed the instant appeal on February 17, 2006, seeking review of an order entered on December 15, 2005. Because the appellant’s post-judgment motion was not timely served within 10 days of the date of filing of the order, see Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b), the motion did not delay rendition. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Contrary to the appellant’s as[505]*505sertion, the time for service of the motion was not extended by order of the trial court. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.090(b); Jones v. Jones, 845 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Consequently, the appellant’s notice of appeal did not timely invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b).

DISMISSED.

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MCB Oil Co. v. City of Gainesville, 932 So. 2d 504, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9788, 2006 WL 1650654 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

932 So. 2d 504 (MCB Oil Co. v. City of Gainesville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Payne v. Jones
183 So. 3d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)