McAvoy v. Rush

248 A.2d 764, 1969 Me. LEXIS 225
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 7, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 248 A.2d 764 (McAvoy v. Rush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAvoy v. Rush, 248 A.2d 764, 1969 Me. LEXIS 225 (Me. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the decision of a single Justice to whom the case was submitted without either jury or complete record of the evidence.

Upon cases so submitted “(f)indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous,” Rule 52 M.R.C.P., which but declares long standing law, and the burden is upon appellant to demonstrate clear error. Sowles v. Beaumier, Me., 227 A.2d 473 [4], 475.

Without a record of the testimony we have nothing by which to measure the findings of fact upon which decision rests.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higgins v. Higgins
370 A.2d 670 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1977)
Blue Spruce Company v. Parent
365 A.2d 797 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1976)
Forer v. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company
295 A.2d 247 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.2d 764, 1969 Me. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcavoy-v-rush-me-1969.