McAvoy v. Rush
This text of 248 A.2d 764 (McAvoy v. Rush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the decision of a single Justice to whom the case was submitted without either jury or complete record of the evidence.
Upon cases so submitted “(f)indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous,” Rule 52 M.R.C.P., which but declares long standing law, and the burden is upon appellant to demonstrate clear error. Sowles v. Beaumier, Me., 227 A.2d 473 [4], 475.
Without a record of the testimony we have nothing by which to measure the findings of fact upon which decision rests.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.2d 764, 1969 Me. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcavoy-v-rush-me-1969.