McAvoy v. Rush

248 A.2d 764, 1969 Me. LEXIS 225
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided January 7, 1969·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the decision of a single Justice to whom the case was submitted without either jury or complete record of the evidence.

Upon cases so submitted “(f)indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous,” Rule 52 M.R.C.P., which but declares long standing law, and the burden is upon appellant to demonstrate clear error. Sowles v. Beaumier, Me., 227 A.2d 473 [4], 475.

Without a record of the testimony we have nothing by which to measure the findings of fact upon which decision rests.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAvoy v. Rush, 248 A.2d 764, 1969 Me. LEXIS 225 (Me. 1969).

248 A.2d 764 (McAvoy v. Rush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Higgins v. Higgins
370 A.2d 670 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1977)
Blue Spruce Company v. Parent
365 A.2d 797 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1976)
Forer v. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company
295 A.2d 247 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1972)