McAvoy v. Kings County

34 N.Y.S. 1024, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 105
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 26, 1895·Published

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

The counsel for the respective parties to this action have stipulated that the issues involved in the appeal in this action are identical with the issues involved in the case of Ahem v. Kings Co., 34 N. Y. Supp. 1023, and requested the general term to dispose of the appeal in this action in the same way as it may dispose of the appeal in the Case of Ahem. As the judgment in the action of Ahern has been affirmed at this term, so the judgment in this action of McAvoy must be affirmed according to the stipulation, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAvoy v. Kings County, 34 N.Y.S. 1024, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 105 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

34 N.Y.S. 1024 (McAvoy v. Kings County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ahern v. Kings County
34 N.Y.S. 1023 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)