McAvoy v. Kings County

New York Supreme Court

McAvoy v. Kings County

34 N.Y.S. 1024, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 105

DecidedJuly 26, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1024 (McAvoy v. Kings County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McAvoy v. Kings County, 34 N.Y.S. 1024, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 105 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

The counsel for the respective parties to this action have stipulated that the issues involved in the appeal in this action are identical with the issues involved in the case of Ahem v. Kings Co., 34 N. Y. Supp. 1023, and requested the general term to dispose of the appeal in this action in the same way as it may dispose of the appeal in the Case of Ahem. As the judgment in the action of Ahern has been affirmed at this term, so the judgment in this action of McAvoy must be affirmed according to the stipulation, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

The counsel for the respective parties to this action have stipulated that the issues involved in the appeal in this action are identical with the issues involved in the case of Ahem v. Kings Co., 34 N. Y. Supp. 1023, and requested the general term to dispose of the appeal in this action in the same way as it may dispose of the appeal in the Case of Ahem. As the judgment in the action of Ahern has been affirmed at this term, so the judgment in this action of McAvoy must be affirmed according to the stipulation, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.Y.S. 1024, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcavoy-v-kings-county-nysupct-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack