McAuslan v. . Green

1 N.C. 260
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1800
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 260 (McAuslan v. . Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAuslan v. . Green, 1 N.C. 260 (N.C. 1800).

Opinions

The answer of Furnifold Green and Sidney, his wife, admits the death of the intestate, Alexander McAuslan, and that she with John Green, one of the defendants, administered on the estate and that the personal *Page 223 estate of the said Alexander McAuslan to a large amount, after paying debts, etc., has come to their hands, but insists that she is entitled to one-half of the clear surplus of the said estate.

The answer of John Green, the other defendant, also admits the death of Alexander McAuslan, intestate, and that he with Sidney McAuslan, his widow, since married to Furnifold Green, obtained administration on his estate, that he has sold the personal estate to a large amount, and has paid to Sidney, wife of Furnifold Green, and to him in (261) right of his wife since their marriage, nearly one-half of the clear surplus of said estate, upon the supposition and belief that she was entitled to one-half, there being no issue. His answer then insists that he is entitled to retain a commission of ten per centum on the whole amount of said estate, which was the allowance made him by the county court of Craven on the settlement of his accounts. It is admitted by the other defendants that he alone has had the care and management of the estate.

Two questions were referred to the Judges for their decision in this case:

1. To what share of the personal estate of Alexander McAuslan who died intestate, without issue, is his widow entitled?

2. Ought any commissions to be allowed the administrator for his care and trouble; if any ought to be allowed, at what rate per centum? The widow has a claim to no more than one-third of the intestate's estate, and a commission of five per centum is fully adequate to the services of the administrator, such as they appear to me.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walton v. Avery
22 N.C. 405 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1839)
Hodges v. . Armstrong
14 N.C. 253 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1831)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcauslan-v-green-nc-1800.