McAuliff v. Reuter

Appellate Court of Illinois

McAuliff v. Reuter

63 Ill. App. 255, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 965

DecidedMarch 31, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 63 Ill. App. 255 (McAuliff v. Reuter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McAuliff v. Reuter, 63 Ill. App. 255, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 965 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

John McAuliff, the original appellant, brought this appeal to the last term of this court; it was submitted November 8, and decided December 2, 1895.

He was dead before that submission, and the judgment of affirmance then entered has been vacated and his administrator and heirs substituted in his place, who have filed an additional brief.

The hardship of the case appeals to our sensibilities, but nothing new as to the law is presented, and the decree must be again affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion first filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

John McAuliff, the original appellant, brought this appeal to the last term of this court; it was submitted November 8, and decided December 2, 1895.

He was dead before that submission, and the judgment of affirmance then entered has been vacated and his administrator and heirs substituted in his place, who have filed an additional brief.

The hardship of the case appeals to our sensibilities, but nothing new as to the law is presented, and the decree must be again affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion first filed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 Ill. App. 255, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcauliff-v-reuter-illappct-1896.