McAulay v. Truckee Ice Co.

21 P. 434, 79 Cal. 50, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 667
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 24, 1889
DocketNo. 12919
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 P. 434 (McAulay v. Truckee Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAulay v. Truckee Ice Co., 21 P. 434, 79 Cal. 50, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 667 (Cal. 1889).

Opinion

Foote, C.

An appeal from an order changing the place of trial of the cause.

The appellant in such case “must furnish the court .with a copy of the notice of appeal, of the .... order appealed from, and of papers used on the hearing in the court below.” (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 951.)

A copy of the notice of appeal, and of the order appealed from is in the record, but there are no papers identified as having been used on the hearing of the motion to change the place of trial.

The court below had the power in certain contingencies to make the order. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 397.) “ There being no showing to the contrary,” it must be presumed to have exercised “its power properly, and within the [51]*51rules prescribed by law,” (Pardy v. Montgomery, 77 Cal. 326.)

We therefore advise that the order be affirmed,

Hayne, C., and Belcher, C. C., concurred.

The Court.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matiasick v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
187 P. 461 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 P. 434, 79 Cal. 50, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcaulay-v-truckee-ice-co-cal-1889.