McAulay v. Ranger Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

McAulay v. Ranger Realty Co.

148 So. 518, 110 Fla. 27

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 2, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for *28 the respective parties, and the record having been s'een and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered,, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and BROWN and Bufoed, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the decision and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for *28 the respective parties, and the record having been s'een and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered,, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and BROWN and Bufoed, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the decision and judgment.

McAulay v. Ranger Realty Co., 148 So. 518, 110 Fla. 27 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

148 So. 518 (McAulay v. Ranger Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.