McAulay v. Board of Supervisors

174 P. 30, 178 Cal. 628, 1918 Cal. LEXIS 573
California Supreme Court·Decided August 1, 1918·No. Sac. No. 2867. In Bank.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

We are satisfied that it must be held that petitioners for the organization of an irrigation district under the act approved March 31, 1897, and acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, may effectively withdraw from the petition for the organization of such district at any time prior to the presentation of the petition to the board of supervisors on the date fixed in the published notice for such presentation, with the result that at the time of such presentation they can no longer be considered by the board as petitioners. If this be true, it follows that the petition here does not make a case for relief.

The application for a writ of mandate is denied. *Page 629

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAulay v. Board of Supervisors, 174 P. 30, 178 Cal. 628, 1918 Cal. LEXIS 573 (Cal. 1918).

174 P. 30 (McAulay v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knowlton v. Hezmalhalch
89 P.2d 1109 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
Uhl v. Collins
17 P.2d 99 (California Supreme Court, 1932)
Doyle v. Jordan
252 P. 577 (California Supreme Court, 1926)
Covell v. Lee
235 P. 79 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)