McAulay v. Bd. of Supervisors of Merced

178 Cal. 628
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 1, 1918
DocketSac. No. 2867
StatusPublished

This text of 178 Cal. 628 (McAulay v. Bd. of Supervisors of Merced) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAulay v. Bd. of Supervisors of Merced, 178 Cal. 628 (Cal. 1918).

Opinion

THE COURT.

We are satisfied that it must be held that petitioners for the organization of an irrigation district under the act approved March 31,1897, and acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, may effectively withdraw from the petition for the organization of such district at any time prior to the presentation of the petition to the board of supervisors on the date fixed in the published notice for such presentation, with the result that at the time of -such presentation they caff no longer be considered by the board as petitioners. If this be true, it follows that the petition here does not make a case for relief.

The application for a writ of mandate is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 Cal. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcaulay-v-bd-of-supervisors-of-merced-cal-1918.