McArthur v. Wilson
This text of 79 S.E. 374 (McArthur v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In this State the statutory right of set-off is restricted to demands or claims of a similar nature to that of the plaintiff, and a claim arising ex contractu can not be set off against a claim arising ex delicto. Civil Code (1910), § 5521; Geer v. Cowart, 5 Ga. App. 251 (62 S. E. 1054).
2. Except as above limited, the right of set-off is a purely equitable right, cognizable only in a court of equity. Hecht v. Snook, 114 Ga. 923 (41 S. E. 74). The city courts of this State have no jurisdiction to allow equitable set-off.
3. In a trover suit a plea setting up a debt claimed by the defendant against the plaintiff should not have been allowed. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 S.E. 374, 13 Ga. App. 502, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcarthur-v-wilson-gactapp-1913.