McArthur v. Wilson

79 S.E. 374, 13 Ga. App. 502, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 238
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 23, 1913·No. 4972·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. In this State the statutory right of set-off is restricted to demands or claims of a similar nature to that of the plaintiff, and a claim arising ex contractu can not be set off against a claim arising ex delicto. Civil Code (1910), § 5521; Geer v. Cowart, 5 Ga. App. 251 (62 S. E. 1054).

2. Except as above limited, the right of set-off is a purely equitable right, cognizable only in a court of equity. Hecht v. Snook, 114 Ga. 923 (41 S. E. 74). The city courts of this State have no jurisdiction to allow equitable set-off.

3. In a trover suit a plea setting up a debt claimed by the defendant against the plaintiff should not have been allowed. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McArthur v. Wilson, 79 S.E. 374, 13 Ga. App. 502, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 238 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

79 S.E. 374 (McArthur v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Phelps
155 S.E.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Wilkes v. Sheppard
122 S.E.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Powers v. Wren
31 S.E.2d 713 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Georgia Power Co. v. Banks
194 S.E. 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchie
166 S.E. 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Porter v. Davey Tree-Expert Co.
129 S.E. 557 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)