McArthur v. Tippins

Supreme Court of Georgia

McArthur v. Tippins

150 S.E. 166, 169 Ga. 302, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 345

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 17, 1929

DocketNo. 7213

StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E. 166 (McArthur v. Tippins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McArthur v. Tippins, 150 S.E. 166, 169 Ga. 302, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 345 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The petition in this case, when considered in its entirety, shows that the agreement by which the land was sold and bought in at judicial sale by the defendant was made with the intent to hinder and delay creditors of the petitioner; and therefore a court of equity will not interfere. The petition was properly dismissed on general demurrer. Anderson v. Anderson, 150 Ga. 142 (103 S. E. 160), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. A. S. Way, for plaintiff. Eason & Everitt, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

The petition in this case, when considered in its entirety, shows that the agreement by which the land was sold and bought in at judicial sale by the defendant was made with the intent to hinder and delay creditors of the petitioner; and therefore a court of equity will not interfere. The petition was properly dismissed on general demurrer. Anderson v. Anderson, 150 Ga. 142 (103 S. E. 160), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. A. S. Way, for plaintiff. Eason & Everitt, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E. 166, 169 Ga. 302, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcarthur-v-tippins-ga-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack