McArthur v. Tippins

Supreme Court of Georgia

McArthur v. Tippins

150 S.E. 166, 169 Ga. 302, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 345

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 17, 1929·No. No. 7213·Published

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The petition in this case, when considered in its entirety, shows that the agreement by which the land was sold and bought in at judicial sale by the defendant was made with the intent to hinder and delay creditors of the petitioner; and therefore a court of equity will not interfere. The petition was properly dismissed on general demurrer. Anderson v. Anderson, 150 Ga. 142 (103 S. E. 160), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. A. S. Way, for plaintiff. Eason & Everitt, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

The petition in this case, when considered in its entirety, shows that the agreement by which the land was sold and bought in at judicial sale by the defendant was made with the intent to hinder and delay creditors of the petitioner; and therefore a court of equity will not interfere. The petition was properly dismissed on general demurrer. Anderson v. Anderson, 150 Ga. 142 (103 S. E. 160), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. A. S. Way, for plaintiff. Eason & Everitt, for defendant.

McArthur v. Tippins, 150 S.E. 166, 169 Ga. 302, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 345 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

150 S.E. 166 (McArthur v. Tippins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related