McArthur v. State

730 So. 2d 333, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2466, 1999 WL 110792
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 1999
DocketNo. 98-1067
StatusPublished

This text of 730 So. 2d 333 (McArthur v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McArthur v. State, 730 So. 2d 333, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2466, 1999 WL 110792 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PETERSON, J.

Allen McArthur was charged with committing a life felony sexual battery1 on Septem[334]*334ber 6,1993. He ultimately pled no contest to a second degree felony sexual battery.2 Pursuant to subsection 794.011(7), he was automatically denied basic gain time. The statute makes gain time unavailable to a person who commits a sexual battery after October 1,1992.

McArthur appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus in which he alleges that the Department of Corrections is violating his constitutional equal rights because a person who is convicted of an attempted sexual battery can be convicted of a first degree felony and still obtain basic gain time, and he was only convicted of a second degree felony. McArthur is correct that a person convicted of attempted sexual battery, even when such crime is a first degree felony, is still eligible for basic gain time, even though he, as one who was convicted of a completed act of sexual battery, is not. The legislature has decided that persons convicted of completed acts of sexual battery are not entitled to gain time while those convicted only of an attempt do not lose gain time. Zopf v. Singletary, 686 So.2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (if the legislature had meant section 794.011(7) to include those who are convicted of attempted sexual battery, legislature would have so stated).

We agree with the trial court that it was the legislature’s prerogative to describe the crimes and prescribe the penalties it deems appropriate for those crimes.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zopf v. Singletary
686 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
730 So. 2d 333, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2466, 1999 WL 110792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcarthur-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.